CFPB Monitor

APRIL 26, 2021

The Attorney Generals of the six states and District of Columbia who filed a lawsuit against the FDIC to set aside its “ Madden -fix” rule have filed a motion for summary judgment in the case. The lawsuit is pending before the same California federal district court judge (Judge Jeffrey S.

FDIC 78

FDIC District of Columbia California Regulation 78

CFPB Monitor

AUGUST 25, 2020

The plain language of the governing federal statute applies only to interest that an FDIC-insured state bank may charge. Allegedly, the FDIC’s rule represents an expansion of the FDIA’s preemption of state law interest rate caps by extending the preemption to assignees of loans originated by such banks.

FDIC 78

FDIC District of Columbia North Carolina Illinois 78

CFPB Monitor

MAY 26, 2021

The FDIC has filed a motion for summary judgment in the lawsuit filed by the Attorney Generals of six states and District of Columbia to set aside the FDIC’s “ Madden -fix” rule. The filing also includes the FDIC’s opposition to the summary judgment motion filed by the AGs.

FDIC 78

FDIC District of Columbia Regulation California 78

PYMNTS

DECEMBER 11, 2017

Hiding a hack can have serious consequences for consumers, banks and businesses, which is why it is illegal to do so in 48 states and The District of Columbia. According to CoinMarketCap , all but one of the top 50 cryptocurrency assets by market capitalization fell over the weekend, for an average loss of around 8 percent in a day.

Bitcoin 110

Bitcoin Data District of Columbia Wisconsin 110

CFPB Monitor

DECEMBER 18, 2020

The OCC has merely speculated that Madden has caused uncertainty in secondary credit markets and, in any event, application of state rate caps to non-banks does not significantly interfere with national banks’ ability to make and sell loans. White who was appointed to the federal bench in 2002 by President George W.

FDIC 78

FDIC District of Columbia North Carolina New Jersey 78